Russian Move Against US Called “First Shot” Of World War III

A grim Ministry of Finance report prepared for Prime Minister Putin is warning today that the decision by Iran to cease taking US Dollars for its oil could very be the “first shot” fired in World War III, and one which Russia will be blamed for by the Obama regime.

According to this report, Iran swiftly countered planed US sanctions against its Central Bank yesterday by announcingthat it will no longer accept the US Dollar as payment for its oil shipments to India, Japan and China, and further announced that bilateral trade between itself and Russia will, also, break from the US Dollar for settlement in favor of the Iranian Rial and Russian Rubles.

Sure to enrage the Obama regime, this report continues, was that the proposal to switch to the Ruble and the Rial was raised by President Medvedev at a meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, in Astana, Kazakhstan, of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

Though Iran had previously announced in 2008 that it had stopped trading its oil for US Dollars (Ahmadinejad called the depreciating US Dollar a “worthless piece of paper”) India, Japan and China were made exempt due to their large holdings of American currency and fears of wreaking further chaos on the global economic collapse that had just begun.

Important to note, this report reminds us, is that a similar move by Iraq’s former leader Saddam Hussein in not accepting US Dollars for oil in 2000 brought about the invasion of his country by the Americans and their European allies resulting in his eventual execution and causing the vast wealth of Iraqi oil and gas fields to be turned over to the Western oil giants.

Likewise, this report says, former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi earned the same fate as Hussein after he, in the months leading up to the US-NATO military attack on his country, called on African and Muslim nations to join together to create a new currency that would rival the US Dollar and Euro and saying that Libya would only sell oil and other resources around the world only for gold dinars.

Most oil sales throughout the world are denominated in US Dollars, and according to proponents of the petrodollar warfare hypothesis, because most countries rely on oil imports, they are forced to maintain large stockpiles of Dollars in order to continue imports.

This creates a consistent demand for US Dollars and upwards pressure on its value, regardless of economic conditions in the United States. This in turn allows the US government to gain revenues through seignorage and by issuing bonds at lower interest rates than they otherwise would be able to. As a result the US government can run higher budget deficits at a more sustainable level than can most other countries.

But, this report reminds us, the current budget deficit of the US has now reached the staggering amount of $15.23 trillion which is the size of its entire economy, and with the Federal Reserve preparing to being another round of massive printing this coming summer the loss of Iran’s oil customers needing US Dollars could very well signal the collapse of the entire American economy.

Though the Obama regime has sent its Treasury Secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, to China and Japan today in an effort to persuade them to cut back on Iranian oil this effort appears doomed from start as the Chinese have outright rejectedthis move and Japan has, likewise, expressed its concerns.

As is always the case in these type of dire matters, reports from the US show its mainstream propaganda media organs are not reporting on this potentially catastrophic turn of events leading to yet another circumstance where the American people will be taken by complete surprise when this cold war suddenly turns hot.

In order to prepare itself for what is to come, however, a vast Russian naval fleet arrived in Syria yesterday in an attempt to forestall US-NATO action against its Middle East allycurrently under attack by the CIA-backed terrorist group known as al-Qaida.

Most shocking in this report are some Russian economists stating that the Obama regime is actually anticipating the collapse of the US Dollar as a “solution” to their being able to implement drastic socialistic change such as was done during the Great Depression under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and which the grim statistics being reported from the US show they are, indeed, nearing total economic collapse and include:

1. A staggering 48 percent of all Americans are either considered to be “low income” or are living in poverty.

2. Approximately 57 percent of all children in the United States are living in homes that are either considered to be “low income” or impoverished.

3. If the number of Americans that “wanted jobs” was the same today as it was back in 2007, the “official” unemployment rate put out by the U.S. government would be up to 11 percent.

4. The average amount of time that a worker stays unemployed in the United States is now over 40 weeks.

5. One recent survey found that 77 percent of all U.S. small businesses do not plan to hire any more workers.

6. There are fewer payroll jobs in the United States today than there were back in 2000 even though we have added 30 million extra people to the population since then.

7. Since December 2007, median household income in the United States has declined by a total of 6.8 percent once you account for inflation.

8. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 16.6 million Americans were self-employed back in December 2006. Today, that number has shrunk to 14.5 million.

9. A Gallup poll from earlier this year found that approximately one out of every five Americans that do have a job consider themselves to be underemployed.

10. According to author Paul Osterman, about 20 percent of all U.S. adults are currently working jobs that pay poverty-level wages.

As the buildup for war between the US and Iran continues to escalate, UN Chief Ban ki Moon’s call for the easing of tensions has gone unheeded as the Obama regimes call for the “dogs of war” to be unleashed on the Iranian people shows no sign of abatement.

To what the final outcome may be in all of these events wasdetailed by Professor Igor Panarin of the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs who has long warned the United States is in a state of economic collapse which will see America being divided up into 6 regions [Map bottom right] due to a “vulnerable political setup,” “lack of unified national laws,” and “divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions.”

Interesting to note about Professor Panarin’s prediction of the United States splintering into different regions are new reports coming from the United States showing that the Obama regime has recently called for the staffing of what are called FEMA Concentration Camps in not just 6, but 10 different regions of their country.

Professor Panarin further warned that “a secret agreement was reached between Canada, Mexico and the US on a common Amero currency as a new monetary unit” and said that “this could signal preparations to replace the dollar.”

When asked how Russia should react to his vision of the future, Professor Panarin said: “Develop the ruble as a regional currency. Create a fully functioning oil exchange, trading in rubles… We must break the strings tying us to the financial Titanic, which in my view will soon sink.”



A Collapsing Mythology: The Death of The 9/11 Myth And War on Terror Consensus

A war based on myth does not end on the battlefield, but in the mind.

„Power positions do not yield to arguments, however rationally and morally valid, but only to superior power.” – Hans J. Morgenthau.

„History is the long, difficult and confused dream of Mankind.” – Arthur Schopenhauer.

„Didn’t I tell you
not to be satisfied with the veil of this world?” – Rumi.

„For historical myths are now commonly perceived as „foundational narratives,” as stories that purport to explain the present in terms of some momentous event that occurred in the past. Stories like these are in many ways historical–though rarely, if ever, do they refer to an actual past. Rather, they refer to a virtual past, to the fact that historical communities, like religions or nations, consist in the beliefs that their members have about them–more concretely, in the stories they tell about them.” – Joseph Mali. (1).

The period of 1992 to 2012 saw the god-like propaganda power of the American empire on full display. Washington’s unbelievable power to distort reality and shape the minds of its global mental subjects was used during this period to sell an aggressive global war on innocent countries. Historians will remember this war as the most evil war in humankind’s history.

Washington, and its allies in Israel and England, conquered the global mind by waging the most sophisticated psychological war against humanity, with the focal point of the war being the 9/11 events. No future superpower will ever rival America in its psychological domination of the planet. It is the first and last empire to even be able to attempt such a grand enterprise.

But all dreams must come to an end at some point – that’s history. The question is, how many innocent people will suffer and die before the myth of 9/11 is completely done away with? Will it be ten million, or twenty? Genocidal-type figures are not out the question. Based on the logic of U.S. and Israeli war propaganda, the American empire has already wiped Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria off the map. Of course, this is an exaggeration.

But if America can kill one million people, why not ten? What’s to stop it? Washington is not governed by a moral conscience, so it literally can kill millions of people and justify its mass murder to the world as an act of liberation. Also, if Israel is allowed to ethnically cleanse Palestinians in broad daylight, then who will stop it from mass murdering other people in the future?

These actions beg the question: Are America and Israel genocidal states?

While Iran is falsely accused of wanting to „wipe Israel off the map,” by U.S. and Israeli propagandists, the U.S. and Israel are actually wiping regimes and nations off the map. Their publicly stated goal is to remake the map of the Middle East, which means reducing the territory of several big states, including Iran, and murdering millions of innocent people.

II. The Use of Mythology To Mobilize Public Support for America’s Foreign Policy

The biggest factor in whether or not America decides to go to war is the American people, which is why they had to be neutralized with the false flag September 11 events. Since the American people are peaceful, moral, and humanitarian, only the perception that they are under attack from foreigners can activate their war spirit, and that perception was provided by the 9/11 fraud.

Without fear, without state terror, without mass media manipulation, the American people would not support America’s conquest of the Middle East. This quixotic project only benefits the private transnational Banksters, fascist multinational corporations, the National Security State, and Israel, all of which have no interest in the survival of America and her liberties.

In the 2002 book, „The Revolution in Military Affairs: Implications for Canada and NATO,” author Elinor C. Sloan, a defence analyst with the Directorate of Strategic Analysis at Canada’s National Defence Headquarters, wrote about the unwillingness of the American people to support big wars. Sloan said:

„Whether true or not, many decision makers now believe that the American people will only support the use of force abroad if it promises smashing victories with few or no casualties. Edward Luttwak has elaborated the view that in future only those forces that are least exposed to casualties, such as high-technology stand-off forces, will be „usable” in a domestic political context.” (2).

The lack of American public support for imperialist policies was treated as a problem to be fixed by the American foreign policy establishment. Near the end of the Cold War, when it was clear that the American empire was no longer needed in the world, a new rationale had to be created to justify America’s global dominance.

In the 1990s, Washington developed a new rationale for the use of force and it revolved around three big policy objectives: stopping nuclear proliferation, countering international terrorism, and overthrowing „rogue” regimes like Iraq, North Korea, Libya, Syria, and Iran. In the absence of the Soviet Union and the communist threat, Washington was forced to invent new threats, as well as raise insignificant threats to the status of international problems.

Robert E. Osgood, a foreign policy expert, defined the problem of American foreign policy in his essay, „The Mission of Morgenthau.” Osgood said the need to devise a new rationale to justify America’s global dominance was imperative because the Cold War was winding down and this massive change created a profound crisis in America’s self-image. Osgood wrote:

„The United States finds itself in an unprecedented situation: It faces the task of maintaining the active and extensive engagement of its power in the international arena without a clear and compelling rationale for doing so. For the presumed reduction of the communist threat dampens the security incentive, while disillusionment with the thesis that the United States must prevent piecemeal aggression everywhere for the sake of the world order deprives whatever security incentive there may be of its larger justification in terms of some transcendent purpose. The wave of self-criticism and loss of moral confidence following the Vietnam War and the Watergate scandal aggravates the predicament.
Monetary, trade, energy, law of the seas, and resource issues have now come to the forefront of international politics and the concerns of American foreign policy, while military-security issues have receded to the background. These issues are by their nature uncongenial to the grand designs and great simplifying concepts or „doctrines” that Americans have loved. Who is the enemy, and how can one rally the nation to deter or defeat him?
Add to these complications the emergence of a variety of claims against the United States and other industrialized states by the poor countries, who are seeking a better economic deal and a redistribution of economic (and hence political) strength in the world. Under the slogans of a „new international economic order” and championed by the developing countries who have discovered the lever of oil prices and supply, these countries appeal to America’s conscience while impinging on its economic interests.
It is little wonder, under these circumstances, that the ambiguous imperatives of power–whether seen in economic, diplomatic, or military terms–should become more difficult to reconcile with the moral principles that Americans have sought to identify with United States policy. In the absence of a compelling anticommunist rationale, the compromises of moral preference that were more or less obscured or tolerated in the Cold War become objects of protest and controversy.
If this kind of moral dissatisfaction with America’s foreign relations fails to provoke a national debate or a moral crisis or even a coherent set of alternatives to the prevailing policies, it is because foreign policy issues are so diffuse and American policy so incoherent.
One is tempted to conclude that American policy will not recover its coherence until the nation as a whole perceives another overriding threat to its security interests, which will once more provide the basis for reconciling the imperatives of power with the dictates of morality.

Might there arise such a threat to America’s economic security? Now that the short-term effect of OPEC’s raising of oil prices has been largely absorbed and the prospect of another embargo remains remote, it is hard to think of other threats to America’s economic interests that could possibly provide the basis for a new consensus on American security.”(3).

The most important point that Osgood made was that, „American policy will not recover its coherence until the nation as a whole perceives another overriding threat to its security interests, which will once more provide the basis for reconciling the imperatives of power with the dictates of morality.”

The question of morality lies at the heart of American foreign policy. Is America the benevolent giant, or is it history’s most evil empire? After the false flag 9/11 attacks and the criminal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, most people would say the latter. But even an evil empire needs to feel good about being evil.

The mythology of 9/11 has enabled Washington, London, and Tel Aviv to exercise the power of gods while pretending to be victims of terrorism. It is simply incredible. There are no words for deception of this scale. America’s hegemony over the mind of man is even greater than that of Christianity and Islam. America is God of Earth. Satan and America are one.

1. Mali, J. Mythistory: The Making of a Modern Historiography. 2003. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. Pg. 4.
2. Sloan, E.C. The Revolution in Military Affairs. 2002. McGill-Queen’s University Press: Montreal and Kingston. Pg. 29.
3.  Osgood, R. E. „The Mission of Morgenthau.” From, „Truth And Tragedy: A Tribute To Hans J. Morgenthau.” Edited by Kenneth Thompson and Robert J. Myers. 1977. The New Republic Book Co., Inc: Washington D.C. Pg.35-38.

The Global Fascist Neo-Feudal State

The global agenda that we find ourselves, not facing, but deeply embroiled in today, can be characterised in many ways, as it is multi-faceted. The various elements of the agenda, though, all share one fundamental characteristic: the advancement of phenomena that, for the vast majority of people, are dehumanising, degrading and debilitating. Yet they are presented to us as being entirely natural, and perhaps the most telling phrase that has been introduced in recent years is the expression “the new normal”. The vast majority of the world’s population is relentlessly conditioned to accept what should be considered repulsive to be normal, even desirable.

There are two over-arching themes that dominate this global agenda. Firstly, is the hierarchical control of society by a banking elite whose tentacles reach out into virtually every social arena.
Secondly, is the irrevocable move towards a global banking and business network from which nosovereign entity can assert independence. The banking hierarchy ultimately desires a world order inwhich everyone on the planet either works for them, or buys what they need to survive from them,or both, while simultaneously annihilating the living standards of the great mass of humanity.

Thus, arguably the key element to this agenda is the globalisation of the economic system. This has been crafted over many decades through agreements such as Bretton Woods, and the creation of the IMF, World Bank and Bank of International Settlements (BIS). This is allied to the increasingdigitalisation of money, with the vast majority of financial transactions not utilising cash, and largenumbers of ‘convenient’ digital monetary systems now being released into the public domain.

Secondly, is the steady destruction of national sovereignty, with global institutions such as the WTO and, particularly, the UN adopting an increasingly prominent position. In accordance withthis is an ‘elite policy network’ which encompasses organisations such as the Trilateral Commissionand the Council on Foreign Relations, somewhat more well-known, but equally nefarious, groupssuch as the G20 and World Economic Forum, and the ultra-secretive Bilderberg Group. Such groups have promoted the legislative environment which has been adopted by governments
all over the ‘Western’ world, which has invoked destroying ‘economic protectionism’ through
legislation such as the GATT and NAFTA agreements and the creation of ‘free trade areas’ such as
the Eurozone. This network is instrumental in creating a consensus amongst political figures from all
over Europe and North America in particular, steered by globalists such as Bilderberger and Trilateral Commission founder, David Rockefeller.

Thirdly, is the domination of valuable resources. The grotesque rape of the ‘third-world’ is chronicled
in John Perkins’ book Confessions of an Economic Hitman, in which he describes the sort of
economic blackmail that has been playing out all over the globe during the twentieth century. This
is nothing new for Africa, as anyone with awareness of Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table group and the
brutal British Empire will testify. When ‘Economic Hitmen’ cannot successfully steal the resources of
a nation, and if the type of CIA-run military coups that date back to Operation Ajax are unsuccessful,
then the NATO war machine – increasingly an unaccountable world army – is sent in to cluster bomb the nation into submission and install a puppet government who will inevitably sign the resources over to the ‘Western’ corporations. And this is always done under the guise of ‘democracy’, ‘human- rights’, or some form of mortal threat to ‘our way of life’.

Fourthly, is the ‘climate change’ agenda, and its attendant paraphernalia. The insane drive to cut
CO2 emissions will serve the purpose of allowing the State to proscribe the most mundane activities, to impose ever more invasive ways of monitoring it, as well as justifying some of the more arcane social programmes that they wish to impose, allowing the corporate sector to make a lot more money for selling a lot less product, and introducing a worldwide ‘Carbon Tax’, which has already been passed in Australia.

Fifthly, is the breakdown of human bonds, traditional social roles, and the importance of locality and
community. This is in order to craft a new culture in which both parents of children work almost by
definition, in which two (taxable) incomes are required to survive, and in which people willingly hand their children over to the State to raise. In which the idea that the satisfaction of individual feelings and desires should be our highest priority is relentlessly promoted; ie. not human relationships, communication and bonding. This desire is then satisfied by purchasing consumer products, provided by multinational corporations, and produced overseas. Yet despite this unremitting pursuit of personal pleasure, virtually every study into human psychology indicates that at no time in human history has there been such mental instability and unhappiness.

Finally, is the manufacturing of consent to this agenda in every area of our lives. We are taught to accept authoritarianism and the imposition of hierarchy through the school system. The comprehensive school system in England is designed to create economically useful worker droneswho accept that all the key decisions are made by a class of person to which they will never haveaccess. And the corporate-owned or state-controlled media, particularly the broadcast media,confuses the public with a hotchpotch of lies, misrepresentations and obfuscations, and presents the existing social order as inevitable.

Meanwhile all financial activity is filtered via taxation through State architecture to private banks, with everything ultimately funnelled into the BIS. This pervades every activity we engage in. Every consumer item carries 20% VAT, with it now being argued that ‘unhealthy’ foods should be taxed.All forms of transport are taxed. Oil is heavily taxed. You pay tax to have rubbish removed. You pay tax for the privilege of having a roof over your head. If you empty your bowels you’re being taxed because you pay private companies for the water. The tax on the air you breathe is coming. And it all feeds into the exchequer, which is paying billions to private banks in interest payments, and ultimately funnels into the BIS, through other central banks.And once they’ve managed to bankrupt everyone, they then send their cronies the IMF in to impose ‘austerity’ measure on the people; ie. rob them blind of what few public assets remain. While the TV tells everyone that everything is okay, and that there’s an ‘economic recovery’ on the horizon.Perhaps the most abiding characteristic of this societal transformation is that it happens incrementally so that people are steadily acclimated to it. So that what should be viewed as dehumanising seems normal. So that what should be recognised as a blatant decimation of living standards by greedy psychopaths is not demonstrably opposed, but instead grudgingly acceptedas being inevitable. This is the great triumph of the social engineers; the ability to use increasingly sophisticated forms of propaganda to promote their view of the world.Essentially, the society we live in now is a technocracy. It’s a culture in which the majority ofhumanity have their views and perspective spoonfed to them by ‘experts’, while any attempts by the great unwashed to form their own opinions are treated with derision; the worst culprit for both of
these phenomena being the BBC. Think all this ‘global warming’ stuff might be a bit dubious? Listento this person with a PhD explain it to you. Concerned about the level of government debt in BritainandAmerica? Don’t worry, here’s someone from LSE to put your mind at ease. NIST have worked out why WTC7 collapsed, theWarren Commission have worked out who shot JFK, an academic has worked out that ‘after-birth abortion’ is perfectly morally justifiable. Just go back to your beer.In order to break out of this hierarchical control, we simply have to remember what it is to be human. We have to demand the right to think for ourselves, we need the intellectual vigour to reject social programming and form our own opinions, we have to define ourselves not by where we work, what we own, or live in, or drive, but by who and what we are. And above all else, we have to show solidarity with others who share our common concerns. As Bill Hicks once said: “The eyes of fear want you to put bigger locks on your doors, buy guns, close yourselves off. The eyes of love, instead, see all of us as one”.The elites have long since understood that strength lies in numbers, in consensus, in workingtogether. A cursory glance at the Royal bloodlines and the Huxleys, Galtons,Darwins andWedgwoods would confirm quite emphatically that they’ve been interbreeding for generations. This is precisely why they have worked so hard to create an atomised culture and done so much to break down the social bonds that tie people together. Until we learn to arrest this alarming tendency, then our culture and society will slide further into the abyss, towards the global fascist neo-feudal State that the social controllers have been working toward for so long.